tjj wrote:
harestonesdown wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
harestonesdown wrote:
Point taken. Though i did bump this yesterday when it was suggested TMA shouldn't be used as a vehicle for self publicism. :)
Who suggested that?
My conclusion reading your posts yesterday. You seem to have a real problem with Roy, whether that be due to him "advertising" his book here, or not sharing the detail. I think he's as much right as anyone, and a right to be addressed with a little respect as all should be, again something you've an obvious problem with for some reason. It doesn't sit well with the spirit of this site, imo.
Bloody hell Geoff! You know I love you to bits but you are like someone who has given up smoking and all that. I'm with EGD on this one so long as things don't sink to name calling. Roy's enthusiasm and efforts are commendable indeed but as soon as a new topic starts his pet subject suddenly gets bounced back again and off we go again ... never really reaching any conclusions. I've heard about tantric sex and am sure that gets boring too.
Lol, love you too mum.
As you know i've no problem people having opposing views, but convey your differences with a bit of respect, that's all i'm saying. I didn't comment on the Trevethy thread yesterday due to EGD's comments as i saw them as way over the top and inflammatory, and i didn't want to add fuel to the fire, which i would have almost most certainly done if i'd not slept on it.
Things have changed a lot here recently imo, for the better, but if we can't address each other respectfully there's little chance of it lasting.
