harestonesdown wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
harestonesdown wrote:
Point taken. Though i did bump this yesterday when it was suggested TMA shouldn't be used as a vehicle for self publicism. :)
Who suggested that?
My conclusion reading your posts yesterday. You seem to have a real problem with Roy, whether that be due to him "advertising" his book here, or not sharing the detail. I think he's as much right as anyone, and a right to be addressed with a little respect as all should be, again something you've an obvious problem with for some reason. It doesn't sit well with the spirit of this site, imo.
I specifically outlined my problem with some of the contents of that thread in an earlier post, so it is puzzling as to why you are bringing this up. I intentionally made it perfectly clear to avoid this type of situation.
I have no issue whatsoever with anybody promoting their work here. That is not the issue. Im not going to repeat my post here but if you are interested in my view but are unaware of it, I suggest you read it from earlier today.
