This is how I see the situation:

Many of us - myself included - saw a stone setting near to The Druids Circle and wrongly assumed it was Circle 278. greywether subsequently posted a photo of the real Circle 278:

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/25505

.........a ringcairn at the exact location of Circle 278 ring cairn.

The stone setting doesn't seem to have had much attention paid to it by the archaeos and it remains un-named. So, if we want a name for it, then we should make one up between ourselves - no-one else is going to do it.

While we're at it, we should come up with some names for Circle 278 and Circle 275, becuse they aren't names, they're numbers - and they both deserve better.