Circle 278 forum 2 room
Image by postman
Circle 278

Two views on 278

close
more_vert

A little bit more here from Frances Lynch; I emailed back to express thanks, and asked if she knew what the monument designation might be of feature formerly known as circle 278, and here is what she said.

Cheers

Tim

"difficult to know what CARN might call them, but 'Stone setting' is the most generalised term
Frances Lynch"

There is no doubt about the description of 278. The word "enclosure" is used on the (coflein & OS) map, with a corresponding entry on coflein, which ties the enclosure to 278. (When I first saw 278, I thought it could be a hut circle - cf those on Gardom's Edge, Derbys - an example here http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=324).

Clicking on the blue dot for enclosure on the coflein map, 278 is then described as a ring cairn. "An oval enclosure, c.16m in diameter, defined by a kerbed stony bank, 2.0-3.0m wide. Several cremation deposts, inurned and otherwise, were observed about the inner periphery during excavation" SH72167457. This must be 278.

However some other things come to light :-)

The feature formerly known as 278, the stones SWW of Druids, are identified as just "Penmaenmawr Stone Circle" SH72197463

Also

- this is just south of feature formerly known as 278. There is a feautre called "Penmaenmawr Circle C" on Coflein. SH722746 (rounded up number from previous ref). This site has not been accounted for while dealing with the others.

Into the melting pot,

Tim

(apologies if that does not make sense... my wife is watching eastenders, and the doorbell went halfway through composing this posting - our neighbours are full of domestic strife - so I've had a bit of a shock, and my train of thought is seriously interrupted!)

She's being very patient with you - her first reply was thorough. Splitting internet hairs is essentially futile, particularly when there is so much raw material to be recorded and 'interpreted'.