"Where have I said that HA is inactive?"
Well, refering to us as Heritage inAction seemed to be a bit of a clue.

I was happy to follow FW's lead (baaaa!) in charitably assuming it was a typo but since you haven't taken the opportunity to say it was I'm not sure.

On the other hand, I'm mighty sure that the words "the recent tale of woe about the chairman not wanting to meet EH was sad'' was calculated to belittle though. I posted my feelings about the issue on here and invited people to give their opinions, as I thought they were entitled to a say, that's all. No tale of woe.

Anyhow, for the avoidance of future doubt, the organisation is Heritage Action and we ain't inactive.