nigelswift wrote:
http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/adsdata/arch-352-1/dissemination/pdf/vol_031/31_181_188.pdf
"of a point where there is still seen a few upright stones, apparently the remains of a 'Druidical circle" is possibly the only mention of the site i'm talking about, in that article thanks nigel, the cist and standing stones mentioned have nothing to do with the stone circle apart from the fact that they are close, it's strange how the man mentions the stone circle but doesn't go see it either, he just mentions the place, this site must have been keeping people away for 100's of years.