Littlestone wrote:
Almost inevitable that any reviewer would then write "Interesting little book. But of course it is very dated, and has been overtaken by new research..."
Can't actually see those words in Rob Ixer's review in BritArch Mr m - m'be I'm missing something. What he actually says is, "This independently-produced and excellently-illustrated little book deserves its place alongside other populist Stonehenge titles..."