Bluestonehenge forum 2 room
Image by harestonesdown
Bluestonehenge

So anyway​…

close
more_vert

What about Bluestonehenge...
The name Bluestonehenge is a bit of a mouthful - can't see it sticking. Suggest Blustonhenge (and if it's ever adopted remember it was first mentioned here ;-)

Littlestone wrote:
The name Bluestonehenge is a bit of a mouthful - can't see it sticking. Suggest Blustonhenge (and if it's ever adopted remember it was first mentioned here ;-)
Seeing as it's the 21st century, I reckon we should sex it up a little - how about B-Henge? Or Blstnhng? (One for the txt generation there!) Or just contract it to "Blunge"? ;)

G x

Thinking of which here is a bit I stuck on my blog a while ago:

The Stonehenge Blau Stones
http://brian-mountainman.blogspot.com/

Some time ago I was in correspondence with Geoff Kellaway, the first man to bravely stick his head above the parapet on the glacial transport theory for the bluestones.

He sent a paper in which he argues that the bluestones were never described as BLUE stones by the early visitors to Stonehenge, but that in the Middle Ages (ie around the time of Geoffrey of Monmouth and later) they might have been referred to in Ango-Saxon as BLAU stones — with the word “blau” meaning striking, different, or of unusual or striking appearance. This is interesting — I hadn’t come across this idea before!! Is anybody else familiar with it?

Of course, this would make sense, since the stones are not actually blue at all — they are not that different in colour from the sarsens. But it’s intriguing to think that from an early stage people might have recognized them as simply DIFFERENT.