Slaggyford Stones 1
Image by StoneGloves

The OS have a cairn not a currick marked at the top of Kip law .From the site of the stone (which is not 100 % accurate as I ‘m not sure which one it is as seen on GE but this will have little impact on the result as both extremes of the “wall “ occupy less than degree at the distance to Kip law plus I believe it is fairly central ) to the summit is 105 degrees which provides a declination of minus 3.9 . The required azimuth to get the minor standstill decliantion of minus 19.7 from the stone would have to be 131 degrees , quite a bit off .

Yes, that was the wrong hill I gave you for the southern extreme moonrise. I think another section, of what I take to be a sturdy stone row, aligns with Kip Law, which does indeed have a substantial hilltop cairn. It's been three years since I was in that valley so I must apologise for being rusty. The alignment for the southernmost section of the row, where the carved (or so-called carved) stone was found, is to Newshield Moss, beside the Alston TV transmitter. Have a look at this picture ( http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/589664 ) and there's a small hollow to the right of the TV aerial. That is more pronounced from lower down, looking up. I sat and watched the southern moonrise from the top of the fells, just once. It rose over Alston and I sat on the edge of what perhaps had been a stone circle. Views of seventy/eighty miles nort and south.

The monuments I have found in the main valley - the upper South Tyne - are mainly wrecked. Up the tributary valleys are where the intact stuff is found. Here is a picture of a typical currick ( http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/135210 ). They can be seen generally from one view angle only and often show annual, or biannual, sunsets. Your declination calculation for the Slaggyford stone row (I) gives a decent value for the equinoctal sunrise, so thanks for that, even if the line of sight is now obscured by tree cover. There are three potential alignments from that elongated - z structure, two to the south and one to the north. The one to the north probably had a fairly large outlier, which is still in place, though felled, and, I think, looked to an open horizon. There is a prominent drumlin, very close by, with a ledge cut into the side, near the top. This has been investigated and is listed as prehistoric, but don't ask me for the reference number.

It doesn't harm anything to Google the term 'Kirkhaugh gold'. It is a possibility that gold was another of the minerals being processed locally. It is preserved in placenames, such as Geltsdale ...

Also, if you have some spare time with GoogleEarth try the coordinates, 54 51' 41.9" N, 2 30' 27.4" W. That's the large mound that is at the end of a trackway from that collection of stones that I call a stone row. Look how round the mound is - which would be very unlikely for a natural - presumably glacial - feature.

The location data for this ring-marked stone - as it appears in the TMA .KMZ file - is fairly close. It is noticeable that as soon as you have produced a result - rough you described it as before you did the calculation - that favours my assumption of a stone row, then you drop it 'like a hot brick'. Which clearly demonstrates negative bias, or prejudice.