StoneGloves wrote:
I'm afraid we'll have to disagree. If you look at the colour photograph, on the 'Knaresdale 1' page, you'll see many walls. They're the ones that I used to rebuild and repair. The house, down in the valley, is where I used to live. It's just called the Knar.
It's not only me you are disagreeing with . You are the only one who sees these markings as being man made .It's a pity the surveyors didn't look further, as the two standing stones are just a little way further on. The smaller one has what could be called a pair of conventional cupmarks. But then maybe they would just think they were glacial erratics that landed the right way up.
Compare the quality of information in the ERA report , something described by you as a fiasco ,with your judgement based on no knowledge or experience of the subject and some pics just clear enough to show the markings are natural .
