thesweetcheat wrote:
GLADMAN wrote:
Whoah...... there are some great points being raised here by NG. When do you draw the line under a sites period of active use in terms of serving the human spiritual condition?
Surely a hill with a cairn on top that has at least a fair likelihood of being prehistoric (no matter how altered) could be considered to be a "sacred hill"?.....
Interesting that there may be less of a tradition of summit burial in Scotland? Only been to about 20 tops, so can't really comment. Guess I need more fieldwork. England, too.