Trethevy Quoit forum 11 room
Image by stonefree
close
more_vert

The 1824 report says the capstone was resting on 5 uprights, so presumably the backstone (whether original or not) was one of them.

It still seems that the current set-up could be reached by shifts and falls over millennia (partly while under cover/semi-cover of a mound). Then you don't need a theory of major re-arrangement to get the shape we have now.

That's very true, none supporting stones could have fell over time and being moved about, one big job would like you said have probably been known about, I didn't think Roy was saying one big change, just that things fell when the capstone slipped, was that reported - when it slipped?