Trethevy Quoit forum 11 room
Image by space penguin
close
more_vert

Evergreen Dazed wrote:
tiompan wrote:
“How does one research a quoit "correctly " ?
I am particularly keen to hear the answer to this.
'Correct' method of research? How does anyone do this unless they start somewhere, I am always reading via the 'news' research papers claiming this, that and the other, how do I know any have arrived at the truth? I don't.

Therefore, I read, ingest that particular news, find my answers in my own subjective way, as most of us do on here!

moss wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
tiompan wrote:
“How does one research a quoit "correctly " ?
I am particularly keen to hear the answer to this.
'Correct' method of research? How does anyone do this unless they start somewhere, I am always reading via the 'news' research papers claiming this, that and the other, how do I know any have arrived at the truth? I don't.

Therefore, I read, ingest that particular news, find my answers in my own subjective way, as most of us do on here!

Perhaps you have misunderstood moss.

Sanctuary said "Others only think differently George because they have not researched the quoit correctly"

I'm just keen to know how I research a quoit 'correctly' lest I become one of the 'others' who only think differently because they haven't researched correctly, like Sanctuary.

It doesn't look like an answer is forthcoming though.

Tragic. Truly.

And, just to make the point clear, i'm aware I am taking a rather dismissive view on this thread, and others have shown a great deal more patience, but i'm afraid this particular type of arrogance irritates me to the point where I can only respond with the rudeness, or perhaps the intellectual disrespect, which is being shown by the original poster in the first instance.

I am being presented with a self published book, advertised by the author on a public forum, the author stating with seemingly unending self-assurance that others have not researched the quoit 'correctly', among other things, and that his unreviewed, personal thoughts are something everybody should be taking notice of. Add to that a history from the author of dismissive posts regarding the 'professional' archaeologist and replies of the type 'Why should I tell you, read the book' when asked too difficult a question and we end up with something so utterly self-interested and vulgar it makes my hair stand on end and is an insult to all genuinely enquiring minds.

I find it astounding.