Trethevy Quoit forum 11 room
Image by swallowhead
close
more_vert

Evergreen Dazed wrote:
...desperate connections attempted, typical self published, unreviewed fare.
There’s nothing wrong with self-publishing (as opposed to vanity publishing). If it was good enough for Beatrix Potter it’s good enough for anyone. It’s those who claim they're working on this book or that book, and it’ll be out shortly but never is, that gets my goat. If you’re going to criticize Mr Goutté’s book at least have the courtesy of reading it first and then do it with his research in front of you.

Littlestone wrote:
It’s those who claim they're working on this book or that book, and it’ll be out shortly but never is, that gets my goat.
From now on, instead of just letting you do it repeatedly, as I have for ages, every single time you say anything that I think is aimed at me I shall put up this link http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/forum/?thread=68269&message=867174 in order to discourage you.

Littlestone wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
...desperate connections attempted, typical self published, unreviewed fare.
There’s nothing wrong with self-publishing (as opposed to vanity publishing). If it was good enough for Beatrix Potter it’s good enough for anyone. It’s those who claim they're working on this book or that book, and it’ll be out shortly but never is, that gets my goat. If you’re going to criticize Mr Goutté’s book at least have the courtesy of reading it first and then do it with his research in front of you.
There's nothing wrong with self publishing per se. Especially if you are writing stories about rabbits.