Sanctuary wrote:
harestonesdown wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
Good luck with it Roy. I'll be very interested on people's opinions once they get the gist of your theory. ;)
Thanks Geoff.
No worries.
And at the risk of being labelled elbow deep in your anal tract :P It's genuinely worth a read ! Even if someone tears it to bits with something fundamental i've missed. Would have liked the stones measurements though. ;)
I'll just add - Those with preconceived expectations will be surprised here, I was. ;) And though we've had our "differences" in the past Roy i sincerely hope this reaches the intended audience for perusal.
The next Stonehenge granary it aint !
Edited to add: I very much believe the onus will be on people to prove you wrong on this, something that was the other way round with ALIW, given what i've seen via e-mail.
