Trethevy Quoit forum 11 room
Image by Chris Bond
Trethevy Quoit

Trevethy Quoit

close
more_vert

tiompan wrote:
Horsedrawn wrote:
Foggy and Compo are in an axe-shaped (!) field .87 kilometres from the Quoit on a bearing of 295 degrees. Their position is 50.27.47N 4.27.59W.
I proceed on the understanding that they are modern rubbing posts due to the drill marks on Foggy, but their shape and relation to the quoit continue to fascinate. They do not form part of the present astronomical survey.
However I do not dismiss them entirely; they took me long enough to find!
Apologies for any confusion. I will endeavour to be more clear in future.

David Kane.

These are the ones I thought from your original pic and in the reply I mentioned that the orientation is close very to Samhain and Imbolc sun rise being about 3-4 days out . If ,as is likely ,that these stones are not prehistoric then this is a good example of finding astronomical alignments that are actually meaningless .Just because something appears to be aligned on a Thom paradigm event doesn't mean it was intended by the builders , obvious in this case but also arguably even cases of monuments that are contemporaneous .
I seem to have missed that pic, what post was it in as I can't find it?
Cheers, Roy

Sanctuary wrote:
I seem to have missed that pic, what post was it in as I can't find it?
Cheers, Roy
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/95799/trethevy_quoit.html#comments

The quoit sits on the top (almost) of its little island of a hill and it is possible to skyline it from almost anywhere on the 200m contour to the west where it will eclipse the rising sun. The way the quoit gobbles up the risen sun and spits it out into the sky remains one of the lesser known spectacles of optical dynamics at ancient sites. I was surprised to find Foggy and Compo because they were where I might expect them to be. As you say, a salutory lesson, and for the very reasons you mention. As to the great Professor Thom, I have always been an avid student of his work but I have to say that I remain a student also of the great Professor North. Thom is never forgotten, but it is the North paradigm that has formed the basis of all my work to date. However all this pales now into insignificance in the face of the 'Trethevy Paradigm' that this astounding structure forces onto the consciousness.
I note we are neighbours.
I'll gladly meet you up there anytime mate.