Trethevy Quoit forum 11 room
Image by Mannaz
Trethevy Quoit

Trethevy Quoit

close
more_vert

Megalithics wrote:
Mr Hamhead wrote:
I don't believe the capstone ever sat on just the back and front uprights...I think the back upright fell when the capstone was dragged into place.
Mr H
Interesting, so do you believe the monument was abandoned during construction after the back slab fell?

Considering the expertise in juggling multi-ton lumps of rock shown by the rest of the monument, it would seem that a back-slab re-erection would not have been too much trouble.

No...I think the whole thing was surrounded by a mound....when they dragged the capstone up the mound the side stone fell in. I think they would have continued to use it, entering from the other side.....
...the same could have happened at Mulfra and Zennor.....
As you correctly state, we'll never know.

You can almost hear the builders - "Easy, easy, just a couple of (insert period correct length units here) more, nearly there, CRUNCH! - OH BU@@ER!"

Maggie & Keith

OOOPs I appear to have added my reply inside the last post...

sorry...bloodyamateur

Mr Hamhead wrote:
No...I think the whole thing was surrounded by a mound....when they dragged the capstone up the mound the side stone fell in. I think they would have continued to use it, entering from the other side.....
...the same could have happened at Mulfra and Zennor.....
Except the engravings of Zennor (if accurate) show the capstone in situ like Lanyon. Interesting though.

Mufra always reminds me of TMA (the book) and how Julian makes the point about its age by reference to how old it would have been to (I think) Jesus, which I always liked as a perspective-ometer. And also that it looks so simple to just put the slab back on...