Rotherwas Ribbon forum 4 room
Image by nigelswift
Rotherwas Ribbon

The Rotherwas Ribbon cover-up

close
more_vert
Mortimer M
Mortimer Sep 5, 2008 17:27:08
Replying to nigelswift

I think that just because some archaeologist says it might have been spiritual doesn't give it legitimacy. Many people have thought this in the past and been rounded on by various people in many places. Or may be it tells us that archaeologists might be a bit slower than others. I can't say. But we must be cautious in accepting something because one group says it is correct. The spirituality of the people who built these monuments is, after all, unknown. Speculative remarks such as that should at least be admitted as such.

M moss
moss Sep 5, 2008 17:54:02
Replying to Mortimer

"Speculative remarks such as that should at least be admitted as such."

And yet when it comes to writing archaeology books are'nt most of them based on speculation given the restricted evidence that is found in prehistory. Its fine dating pottery, bronze etc but how monuments were used in a ritual sense we have only an incomplete picture. For all the excavation at Stonehenge at the moment, the books that will be written will be dancing on the head of a pin as far as the 'real' interpretation goes.
So why can't we speculate under your rules? for a start, it would shut down quite a few megalithic forums ;)

T tiompan
tiompan Sep 5, 2008 18:50:20
Replying to Mortimer

Mortimer wrote:
I think that just because some archaeologist says it might have been spiritual doesn't give it legitimacy. Many people have thought this in the past and been rounded on by various people in many places. Or may be it tells us that archaeologists might be a bit slower than others. I can't say. But we must be cautious in accepting something because one group says it is correct. The spirituality of the people who built these monuments is, after all, unknown. Speculative remarks such as that should at least be admitted as such.
There was a time when archaeologists were diggers with a background in classics and saw everything from the barbarians fighting for survival angle , that chaged inthe 60s-70s with processualism and post processualism when thinking that had previously been the preserve of hippies , sacred landscapes etc became acceptable . It now seems we are inundated with phenomenologists who write totally subjectively making the earlier hippy stuff seem quite pedstrian . Wainwright and Darvill are essentially repeating Geoffrey of Monmouth , others like Tilley seem to be more like Tolkein . At least there is some excavating getting done and we can make up our minds . Quite agree though we have no way of retrieving the sacredness ,if there ever was any of the "ribbon " assuming it is safe under the road some better placed archaeos will be able to play about with it in a few decades/centuries .