Churches on TMA

close
more_vert
Megalithic M
Megalithic Jan 26, 2003 00:02:33
Replying to Pete G

I'll be accused of my usual advertising here, but as we at the MegP already welcome fields that once had stones in them, and all the obscurest humps of the Midlands (right P&V :-) we will be welcoming ancient churches with unusual features such as Pagan leanings too.

Not merely a kneejerk - we have a number of other related new categories in the pipeline too. Anyone else wishing to contribute grid refs and details of ancient stuff that you're not interested in on this site please get in touch. Now that's not competition is it?

Go on, flame me then [ducks]
Andy

F FourWinds
FourWinds Jan 26, 2003 00:14:07
Replying to Megalithic

Can't flame you for widening your ring, if that's the way you want to go, can we?

It's an odd one, but empty fields are needed to complete the big picture. I can't remember who said that about empty fields.

I think our point was that the site was welcome as a misc note, so that people know a stone stood here or that this church is built on the site of a stone circle, we just don't want pictures of the fecking church! And I'm sure you don't want to be cluttered up with images of spires and bell towers either.

Ignore me if you want to, but I recommend you try and state the intention of your new catagories (if they include "Church Plonked On Old Oak Grove" and similar) otherwise you'll end up with a load of kak that will greatly devalue the other stuff on your site. And that would be a shame, as despite our differences it is a great resource.

G Grendel
Grendel Jan 26, 2003 15:49:17
Replying to Megalithic

Ahem...the Midlands...you need to reword that to the Northwest otherwise the northerner gets very unhappy ;-)

G