Stonehenge

Sanctuary wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
Hi Moss
Put this in your search engine for the Academic report.
https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.239

Roy x

And here's a reply to it. Is this just yet another latest yearly sensation at SH?

https://brian-mountainman.blogspot.com/

Well being a sceptic, I do feel more info is needed. For some reason 17th century teeth and Gary Denke goes through my mind.
I think proof either way can never be found and that 'media news' is just that.
But it is an interesting flutter of speculation in an otherwise miserable period of life........

[/quote]

Well being a sceptic, I do feel more info is needed. For some reason 17th century teeth and Gary Denke goes through my mind.
I think proof either way can never be found and that 'media news' is just that.
But it is an interesting flutter of speculation in an otherwise miserable period of life........[/quote]

These wrecked and buried 'possible circles' are certainly interesting, to say the least. Seen quite a few in my time and have left thinking 'are you sure?' The Mam C and I didn't venture here when visiting the excellent nearby Bedd yr Afanc some years back precisely because of the lack of above-ground features. Would be beneficial for a balanced view to understand the pros and cons, since MPP does have a bit of a reputation - does he not? - which clearly galvanises opinion.