close
more_vert

You're quite right and it's a fair point. I seem to recall having two concerns at the time this was originally proposed. I don't think I was alone in having concerns buy I also thought there was some real merit, subject to these concerns:

1. Concern about the rigour and robustness of the surveying work being done by untrained amateurs. I remember saying at the time that surveying is technical and needs more than enthusiasm. I hope though that this fear was unfounded and that good instructions and advice were provided.

2. That this was a worrying example of the government wanting something done on the cheap without being prepared to invest in archaeology and heritage bodies. I still have that concern and in fact it has got worse in the subsequent years. I did admit at the time though that it was extremely unlikely that heritage bodies would be able to carry out a national survey of this scale without volunteers to assist. But examples at a regional scale such as the exhaustive Welsh Uplands Survey show what can be done with the right backing.

All that said, I applaud the efforts of everyone concerned and I am looking forward to spending time on the site. Like TMA, any online archaeo resource is a welcome addition. Any apparent negativity on my part was borne from those concerns and I'm certainly sorry if it came across as anything else.

If anyone is interested in seeing the original reaction on TMA, it's here: http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/forum/?thread=69114&offset=875