nigelswift wrote:
Well, as as Prof David Gill has asked: "by how much it would have to be "wrong" to make the figures acceptable."
Why not? Did I not make a valid point and you are using other peoples statistics to create a false claim.I think everyone here knows you won't answer that, and why.
Watch, everyone....
Get real Nigel - NOBODY can realistically come up with a figure at all unless EVERY find is observed. Come back and tell us when they are okay.
I don't think I need to say any more now following this. We agree on the thieving being wrong, just at odds over the actual amount.
Now where's that threepenny bit - I must clean it up and put it on Ebay :-)
