close
more_vert

cerrig wrote:
You are very reluctant to reveal your methodology George. Why is that?
Your wrong on two accounts , there are various methodologies .
I have explained how to do some of them here and elsewhere for anyone who asked .

If you don't know , it's not difficult to find out .
As mentioned previously ,I would happily explain to most but I can't be arsed telling you .

I know how to do it George. I don't need a lesson from you. I was just wondering where you were going wrong. Maybe I could help?

tiompan wrote:
cerrig wrote:
You are very reluctant to reveal your methodology George. Why is that?
Your wrong on two accounts , there are various methodologies .
I have explained how to do some of them here and elsewhere for anyone who asked .

If you don't know , it's not difficult to find out .
As mentioned previously ,I would happily explain to most but I can't be arsed telling you .

George, I think if you explained it thus, "The fields are of consciousness that are all connected and within the overall galaxies field, they transfer across to each other along birkeland currents, and the whole system is similer to DNA diagrams" it would be accepted without a murmur. (In fact I know it would).