close
more_vert

Did you allow for the relative height of the horizon? No? Thought not.

Whatever...

If you look you'll find that there is an oval mound and related enclosure where John Michell refers to a round field. Is there any conceivable reason why he shouldn't have mentioned it? I cannot think of any logical reason to do so.

Andy Norfolk wrote:
Did you allow for the relative height of the horizon? No? Thought not.

Whatever...

Thought wrong ,again .
Of course I didn't use the relative height of the horzon .I used the actual altitude .