Detectorists 2

close
more_vert

juamei wrote:
Pro-MD supporter who's good mates with Pro-MD Heritage Trust (lets not go into that history), who has repeatedly been abusive about Nigel's state of mind and the HJ coverage of MD over several years, now says he is concerned and expects us to believe him and pay him credence.

Just let it go Roy, we see right through you.

More than happy to let it go juamei. That's me done.

Upward and onward with my own work.

Sanctuary wrote:
More than happy to let it go juamei. That's me done.
Good. Upsetting people and flouncing away without an apology or admission is a something users of this forum have got very used to from you. It's just a shame you start these things in the first place.

And I can't resist (as I'm obsessive and paranoid and small minded and in a worrying mental state - all things you've said about me here and elsewhere) to put one very crucial thing right. PAS say 70% of finds aren't reported whereas you've said (and many farmers may have read) that non-reporting is confined to “a very small minority of detectorists”. You ought to put that right in the place where you wrote it as it's damaging and as such not at all appropriate for someone who's a heritage ehthusiast.