Detectorists 2

close
more_vert

nigelswift wrote:
However, the sought rise ain't going to come.
That was certainly not the intention Nigel. The current post was meant to be light-hearted and the ones you highlighted were in direct reply to what I felt were unbalanced posts of your own. On more than one occasion I have shown concern for you personally as you seem to concentrate totally on the bad side of detecting and not enough on the good many people have brought to the table. It wears thin and will drive people away.
At least I get a chance to reply back here unlike on HA where you only allow comments that fall in with your way of thinking or ones that you can easily defend. I repeat, I am concerned for you. You are a good guy yourself doing a great job, but please don't become just a one-trick pony when you also have so much to offer in other areas. I mean that sincerely.

Roy

Pro-MD supporter who's good mates with Pro-MD Heritage Trust (lets not go into that history), who has repeatedly been abusive about Nigel's state of mind and the HJ coverage of MD over several years, now says he is concerned and expects us to believe him and pay him credence.

Just let it go Roy, we see right through you.