Great period piece .
And fruitful ground for the old problem of how dowsers manage to debate when there is a disagreement
about what is being “discovered”. Their dowsed energy line differs from Ley line ,so how do they discuss that problem with those who believe that they have dowsed the Ley , but failed to find their line . Does it all become amicable and and both agree that their findings are correct ? Or do they argue about their differing claims and it becomes a numbers game , how many agree with our findings /beliefs ? I imagine the former .
It could go on forever with others “discovering “ lines unnoticed by the previous “researchers “ , who is to say who is right or wrong ? It is entirely subjective .
Prior to the book how many have dowsed the Hurlers and come up with a totally different response i.e. the “energy” does go to the third , but again I imagine that since the book more dowsers have “discovered” that the third is avoided . Stopped laughing so gave up , might watch a bit more later .
