close
more_vert

The reason that the Y and Z holes post date the megalithic is more than just the irregularity ,there is the stratigraphic evidence which supports the belief and also the dating evidence from the antlers .That is convergent evidence with the stratigraphy alone being sufficient to confirm the belief .The irregularity is in their non -concentricity ,Thom described them as being more like a spiral than a circle . The surveyors managed fine with the Aubrey Holes why should they have suddenly have lost their abilities with the Yand Z holes ?

'Thom described them as being more like a spiral than a circle'

7) Z&Y holes, a circle, spiral, or an arc ?

Attempts to impose a circle as in the Wikipedia diagram -
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_and_Z_Holes )
are not able to follow the holes as accurately as the arcs are. The Y and Z holes are not a circle or a spiral, they are two arcs. (as defined by maths geometric shapes) The Eastern arc is just too regular to be an accidentally irregularity.

What is the 'stratigraphic' evidence ?