Re: Epiphanie photography by Gilbert Le Cossec | Forum

Natural Sceptic wrote:

tiompan wrote:

Natural Sceptic wrote:

The atmospheric observation has been scientifically proven (Wilhelm Reich was the first and published all manner of papers, and many have repeated his experiments world wide ever since, and still are)

I assume you mean orgone was observed , if so , in what way did Reich prove it scientifically ?

I mentioned Reich and scientific evidence to respond to Sanctuary, as it is this same 'atmospheric phenomena' this thread is about.

Reich's work is too big to go into here. Suffice to say there is much material out there detailing Reich's experiments from cellular level work to collection & accumulation, atmosphere modification and going on to weather patters and even including hurricane and galaxy development. They all follow similar principles of behaviour and can be altered/effected and observed by the naked eye.

There's a hell of lot of total bunkum out there too, but have look here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPV-JExUPns

Reich did produce a lot of " work" , as a child of the 60's I did read some of it , still got some of his own stuff ( souvenir press iirc )and the Wilson biography but like Michell it was bunkum .
I was concerned with the comment "The atmospheric observation has been scientifically proven (Wilhelm Reich......)"
I don't believe it has been scientifically proven .

btw , did you see a very likely explanation of the Le Cossec's technique , i.e. colorvir , it was produced (not by him) in the same country and period he produced the pics . Haven't heard much of it since ,you might imagine if there was anything in it , he would have refined the technique and produced more startling images but there has been nothing .