close
more_vert

nigelswift wrote:
Natural Sceptic wrote:
I fell as if I'm being cross examined :)
Sorry, but if you say things like
"As for the placing of 'stones' their points are usually marking out, or reinforcing the sacred geometry of the site, anchoring & storing energy. Really, I thought all this was pretty basic"
.... you're bound to get questions.

You're lucky no-one said "no it's not basic it's bullshit" (which would be just as reasonable as what you said!)

Point taken, but for the record, here's the original in context quote:

'My original question was full of the excitement of finally photographing the activity of the places i regularly visit. I don'y know the answers of how the energies I have grown to love behave, I only want to photograph them

As for the placing of 'stones' their points are usually marking out, or reinforcing the sacred geometry of the site, anchoring & storing energy.

Really, I thought all this was pretty basic'

I'll answer any questions (best I can) anyone has the best I can

Yes I do appreciate it's your belief that the stones were for anchoring & storing energy but the thing is there are many here who don't share your belief - so saying it's "basic" isn't going to go down too well.

"Basic for those who believe it" would be fine! :)