close
more_vert

Sanctuary wrote:
It's actually between two circles Alken and was thought to be a 'walkway' or pavement between them, but it's far too rough for that and isn't even quartz stone just ordinary locally sourced granite in keeping with the stones in the circles (confirmed by James Gossop) It finished some 10-12ft from the more southern circle and about 25-30ft from the northern one, so doesn't actually connect them! Thinking again time, but to be fair they were only working from unfinished work only started back in the 1930's.
As with Roman roads, the upper layer of smaller surface stones may have been displaced (though you’d expect there would still be some around). More perplexing, actually, is the shortness of the path and the way it ends so abruptly and in such a precise way. Could that indicate that the path lead to a (much) later building with perhaps a step at the end. Maybe even a path between two buildings...

Littlestone wrote:
Could that indicate that the path lead to a (much) later building with perhaps a step at the end. Maybe even a path between two buildings...
Having said that, a Daily Mail article of yesterday quotes lead archaeologist Jacky Nowakowski as saying, “We have already found two prehistoric flint tools in amongst the stones...”

That’s not definitive though is it, but we may be back to an earlier date for the pavement.