close
more_vert

tjj wrote:
Thank you for you comment Mustard, always appreciated. I may be wrong (I often am) but I thought that whilst we don't know for certain witchcraft and magic were practised as a 'set of beliefs' we do know that the knowledge and practice of herbal healing (and poisoning for that matter) was often condemned as witchcraft.
I think that's a reasonable supposition. It's human nature to beat people with whatever stick is available.

tjj wrote:
The programme 'A Very British Witchcraft' seemed more about Occultism which was alive and well around London when I lived there with bookshops such as Atlantis and Skoob (then near the British Museum) as meeting places. I had a close friend who worked at Skoob and my first ever visit to Avebury and Wayland's Smithy was because there was a spare seat going on the coach trip from London. I always respect other people's beliefs if genuinely held but when someone (as happened on that occasion) starts talking about bringing on the demise of an adversary by casting spells in their direction - I did not want to know, then or now.
I don't respect beliefs. I respect the people who hold them - if that respect is earned.

I dabbled in paganism when I was younger, and I've always felt an affinity with native British mythology and culture (such as we know of it), and the landscape resonates with me in a way that I'd describe as spiritual. Of all the different spiritual practitioners that I've met, however, the ones whose personal ethics, morality, sincerity, conviction and self-sacrifice have impressed me the most have been Christians. Go figure.

I must admit my thoughts on witch crafts have always been 'coloured' by reading Dennis Wheatley at a young age in the 60s. Black magic, horned gods, pentagrams and sacrificial young maidens 'deflowered' ;) and so I had to readjust my thinking to Wicca, and consult the dictionary as to what it meant. So Gardner took an old word and rendered it into his version of witchcraft, and no doubt with a certain wicked cackle, did you not notice the antlered crown on the table in Spain, the Great God Pan has appeared, rampaging around in his usual fertile manner ;) and the phallic knives used for drawing the patterns on the ground, scepticism reared its ugly head but then he could have been genuine. In fact this was a history of an eccentric man, and Ronald Hutton did an excellent historic profile and I have never read anything on Wiccan so who am I to judge? But the word 'paganism' is the one I prefer and relate to in a modern way and perhaps the love of nature and the need to protect our environment, the healing process lies at the bottom of this 'new age' thinking...


"Thanks to Wheatley, people “knew” what Black Magic and Satanism – historic­ally an almost non-existent phen­omenon – were like. Professor Jean La Fontaine made an astute link to Wheatley-derived imagery in her debunking of the Satanic Ritual Abuse panic, and Ronald Hutton, in The Triumph of the Moon, remembers adolescents borrowing “risqué imagery” from Wheatley’s books to decorate parties: “For my generation of Essex teenagers, they represented the essential primer in diabolism.”.

http://www.forteantimes.com/features/articles/2623/the_devil_rides_out.html

Mustard wrote:
......I've always felt an affinity with native British mythology and culture (such as we know of it), and the landscape resonates with me in a way that I'd describe as spiritual.
Yes, I agree with this whole-heartedly.

Mustard wrote:
Of all the different spiritual practitioners that I've met, however, the ones whose personal ethics, morality, sincerity, conviction and self-sacrifice have impressed me the most have been Christians. Go figure.
No, don't agree with this statement. I have met some genuinely good people who call themselves Christians but just as many complete hypocrites. Same goes with pagans, atheists - you name it. Not sure what you mean by "Go figure"... could you clarify please.