close
more_vert

nigelswift wrote:
"The bottom line is: loads of people want to visit and have the right to. You aren't suggesting not letting them surely?
Exactly, they have the right to, as long as it is under EH terms of course! They want to visit, but I'm sure they would prefer to take their time and stroll around amongst the stones and not be herded around a rope or whatever they are now planning.

Thank God we have hundreds of other sites we can visit that are just as interesting, untouched and freely available to us to stroll around...and still have our picnics at.

"I'm sure they would prefer to take their time and stroll around amongst the stones and not be herded around a rope or whatever they are now planning."

Well again you seem to be saying reduce numbers so the erosion danger is less so people can go inside the stones and have a better experience.

Lucky them but what about the ones that are turned away to enable this uncrowded experience to be enjoyed by the minority? How would you select them?

No foreigners, no Gingers, no Northerners..... ;)