close
more_vert

moss wrote:
And talking of him, poor man seems to have been infested with round worm according to this news which has been rampaging through a boring news week...

http://www.theinformationdaily.com/2013/09/04/king-of-england-richard-iii-suffered-from-parasitic-roundworm

Dr Jo Appleby, Lecturer in Human Bioarchaeology at the University of Leicester, UK, shed some light on the situation and explained that: “Despite Richard's noble background, it appears that his lifestyle did not completely protect him from intestinal parasite infection, which would have been very common at the time”.

I've never read reports of this before in remains from the same period (not that I've ever gone out of my way to research it) if it was so common. A bit speculative possible?

Sanctuary wrote:
I've never read reports of this before in remains from the same period (not that I've ever gone out of my way to research it) if it was so common. A bit speculative possible?
Maybe, but evidence 'suggests' and medieval England was never ever known for cleanliness.

"The lack of eggs in soil samples from the skull, and similar samples surrounding the body confidently suggest that the eggs found in the pelvis area resulted from genuine roundworm during his life, rather than from external contamination by human waste in the area."