close
more_vert

Stone circles have nothing left in them [thats why archeologists don't like them] and when they do find stuff it's from a different age [romans liked leaving coins, and other people putting cairns or cremations in them] to when the circle was built, and their not going to be giving all there perfume away are they?? It doesn't give you an uneasy feeling but it does me, it's just my opinion. The video made me cringe [because of the commercialism, some guy gets taken to stonehenge and while there was thinking how he could use daddys money to make money out of the experience] to me it is quite clearly a money making exercise. The only diggers used on our one were to pull it down. The building side for the makers was probably a very underestimated part of the exercise.

bladup wrote:
Stone circles have nothing left in them
[thats why archeologists don't like them]
and when they do find stuff it's from a different age [romans liked leaving coins] to when the circle was built,
Stone circles have been show to have plenty "left in them " . Often the cirle is the last architectural event after depositions of human/animal remains .An obviious example is Stonehenge where the erection of the stones came long after the creation of a ditch and banked enclosed cremation cemetery .
It's pretty obvious many archaeologists actually do like them .Any quotes from any saying they don't ?
Stuff from all periods pre and post circle erection are routinely found .