close
more_vert

Is it rude of me to ask or is it still classified information...what is the theory/idea/proof/viewpoint that has been considered too controversial?

see the post 'upland landscape alteration in south east ireland'. It's been edited slightly because of the 10'000 character limit for postings, but essentially its all there. It was submitted for publication in Deices, the journal of the Waterford archaeological and historical society, but was rejected for being "too controversial". I believe if it had been submitted by a recognised member of the archaeological profession things might be different.