close
more_vert

nigelswift wrote:
Someone on the HA Forum has said to me something that puts a whole new slant on this sight line business - "what if the idea was to have a person or structure on top that would be fully visible from the same locations? So instead of only being aware of it if you knew where to look, something would be obviously protruding above various bits of landscape around Avebury"

Personally, I've always thought a pole or a priest might be what was intended to be seen from Avebury but of course other locations are just as possible.

The truth of studying sight lines is, I think, that we tend to look for them within structures that are the mere skeletal remains of the original landscapes - sans flesh, crops, trees and most of all, a possible forest of long-gone timber monuments and structures. We're guessing about connections that are most probably no longer visible.

Yes and we musn't forget that if, as they now believe, SH took 100 years to complete, you are looking at the chance for 3 or 4 generations to form different views on what the original concept was.

"you are looking at the chance for 3 or 4 generations to form different views on what the original concept was"

or tribes. or nations. or megalomaniacs.

So now we have multiple peoples with multiple beliefs producing multiple stages over multiple time periods but with the vibrant, living element of the whole arrangement (the wooden parts and the human beings) all missing.

So this is where speculation becomes joyously free of the shackles of scientific evidence. You name it, I can back it up by postulating the existence of wooden structures and mindsets to fit, without a shred of corroboration.