close
more_vert

Was it deliberately filled with water originally? I don't know. It would need to be deliberately lined with clay but how can that be known when clay would tend to accumulate over time anyway?

I don't think crocodiles in the moat are the answer as being eaten by one of them might be interpreted as an unlucky accident whereas a slap from Goff could be mentioned on EH's notices as a justified consequence of flouting their request to keep off the hill. He'd be very effective at Stonehenge too, he could hide behind a stone, he's good at that.

nigelswift wrote:
Was it deliberately filled with water originally? I don't know. It would need to be deliberately lined with clay but how can that be known when clay would tend to accumulate over time anyway?
'In 1886, Mr Pass made some excavations and proved that a ditch 15 to 20 feet deep had been dug round the base; this ditch is now completely silted up, but if open it would be full of water all year round, being below river level'.
(An Introduction to the Archaeology of Wiltshire. M E Cunnington 1949).

It that is the case then of course it would be completely full for longish periods of the year and lower at worst at other times, clay lining or not!