Ley Lines

close
more_vert
Sanctuary S
Sanctuary Nov 9, 2010 20:25:34
Replying to tiompan

tiompan wrote:
nigelswift wrote:
"statistically significant"

Gotta formula?
;)

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/25391

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/64185/images/silbaby.html

In the case mentioned 6 sites within 280 metres with no others in the immediate area . 100 % ?
Three points , whether in a straight line or with the central one slightly off don't convince me of intentionality whether in an alignment or based on Orion's belt .
And presumably if you are going to claim 3,4,5 or whatever in a row, then the suggestion is that they were all built or placed in position at the same time if their purpose was to simply be a means of getting from A to B. That is clearly not the case when some sites are older/newer than others...unless other lesser markers were used initially of course i.e. timber posts or single stones.

T tiompan
tiompan Nov 9, 2010 20:52:05
Replying to Sanctuary

Sanctuary wrote:
tiompan wrote:
nigelswift wrote:
"statistically significant"

Gotta formula?
;)

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/25391

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/64185/images/silbaby.html

In the case mentioned 6 sites within 280 metres with no others in the immediate area . 100 % ?
Three points , whether in a straight line or with the central one slightly off don't convince me of intentionality whether in an alignment or based on Orion's belt .
And presumably if you are going to claim 3,4,5 or whatever in a row, then the suggestion is that they were all built or placed in position at the same time if their purpose was to simply be a means of getting from A to B. That is clearly not the case when some sites are older/newer than others...unless other lesser markers were used initially of course i.e. timber posts or single stones.
Sorry S ,can't see how that relates to the quotes .