Moth wrote:
Knew of it but have never got around to going to see it. Not sure I knew it was 'original' stones (or I'd forgotten!)
Thanks for replying Moth,I think it was either briefly on here as a site or has at least been discussed here before tho.
love
Moth
I haven't visited either; I don't recall the discussion but would like to read it. My question was in response to faerygirl's post about what constitutes an ancient site - is one that has been moved (as inferred the Stonor Circle was) still classified as an ancient site.
The other obvious example is Devils Quoits at Stanton Harcourt which I am hoping to visit this weekend. A mainly reconstructed circle on the original site of the ancient one. Is it still an ancient site? The consensus seems to be that it is.
