close
more_vert

"Just because none of these tribes wrote down as much as those fastidious control-freaks from Rome did — or coerced their starving serfs into building huge, vainglorious cathedrals, as the conquering Normans did — doesn’t mean that they should be eternally libelled as mindless louts."

Quite. I was taught at school that the Romans brought 'civilisation' to Britain.

Then I went to Skara Brae and saw what a total falicy that proved to be with mine own eyes. Ha!

Setting aside the obvious inconsistency that no society which practicised human sacrifice could possibly be labelled 'civilised' in the first place, how ironic was it that it took the supposedly barbarian Goths et al to eliminate this Roman practice?

Setting aside the obvious inconsistency that no society which practicised human sacrifice could possibly be labelled 'civilised' in the first place, how ironic was it that it took the supposedly barbarian Goths et al to eliminate this Roman practice?
Aye, sacrifice (human or otherwise) in cultures outside Greco-Roman influence do seem linked to religious practices and not to 'sporting activities'.

It's hard to put yerself in the shoes of either side some two thousand years on but it does feel like the gladiatorial tradition that we see, and still celebrate today in the form of sporting events, has become the norm.

As for setting the historical record straight re: ancient British and Anglo-Saxon cultures. While abhorring the illegal and unprofessional collection of artefacts from those periods (by metal detectorists, amateur archaeologists and those who profit from those activities) I do welcome any addition to our knowledge and understanding of those periods in our history.