That was what was going through my mind. Surely that would make taking photos of anything infringement of copyright. If you take a photo of say St Paul's do you have to get permission from the Church first. And what about landscapes. If you take a photo you would have to get permission from all the landowners whose land is in the photo. I think they may be pulling a fast one here. I have in the past come across places where you cannot take photos so the owner of the property can sell photos of his/their own.

Peace , Lubin