Calling Tiompan

close
more_vert
gjrk G
gjrk Jun 1, 2009 13:14:09
Replying to tiompan

tiompan wrote:
It's odd how some sites are just a wee bit away from the great view and/or hidden from viewing another nearby site , it often appears intentional.
I'd be inclined to agree. Around here it's the rows that tend to be set up that way. But not all. Actually one of the things that prompted me to go on this "great white whale/ lines across the landscape" hunt was noticing that (on the ground) you could see the four stones at Maulatanvally indicated to the SW from one row, Knockawaddra W:

N51.99210, W-9.05530 Knockawaddra W
N51.64856, W-9.06910 Maulatanvally

[Dec -32.4 to -30, Azimuth 211 to 215; Ruggles AiPBI, 219]


Do you mind if I pop you off a few more, just to disillusion me further? ;)

T tiompan
tiompan Jun 1, 2009 13:32:55
Replying to gjrk

gjrk wrote:
tiompan wrote:
It's odd how some sites are just a wee bit away from the great view and/or hidden from viewing another nearby site , it often appears intentional.
I'd be inclined to agree. Around here it's the rows that tend to be set up that way. But not all. Actually one of the things that prompted me to go on this "great white whale/ lines across the landscape" hunt was noticing that (on the ground) you could see the four stones at Maulatanvally indicated to the SW from one row, Knockawaddra W:

N51.99210, W-9.05530 Knockawaddra W
N51.64856, W-9.06910 Maulatanvally

[Dec -32.4 to -30, Azimuth 211 to 215; Ruggles AiPBI, 219]


Do you mind if I pop you off a few more, just to disillusion me further? ;)

No problem Gordon , send away . It's always info whether positive or negative , it just might add a scintillas worth to our understanding.