close
more_vert

Stoneshifter wrote:
Are you qualified as an archaeologist?
No - completely untrained.

[/quote]Which skills do you use to decide whether sites are ancient or not?[/quote]

None - apart from having been dragged around a lot of prehistoric sites over the last few years and grown to be fascinated by them - plus a fair bit of reading and watching this site. The mound you propose as a long barrow - would be at least twice as big as any previously discovered in these islands, is crescent shaped and could easily have another interpretation. That doesn't mean you're wrong but does put the burden of proof on you.

[/quote]I need the support of professionals - I've spent far too long disputing with people on here about archaeology to consider repeating those follies.[/quote]

Why are you here then?

And why remove some sites you have posted but not others?

The person who introduced me to all this stuff grew up in the area and we'd be very pleased to see your assertions confirmed - but that seems unlikely to happen if you won't give any supporting facts - apart from 'You have to believe me because I know what I'm talking about'.

I get the impression most people who contribute would be well disposed and supportive - whether they are professional or not - given a fair chance.

Well, at least you're not telling me that they're spoil heaps. The crescent-shaped hill has two names, locally. The north-south part is called Sunny Bank and the east-west part is called Halliwell Hill. These are old Ordnance Survey labels. So another way of looking at them is as two, connected, barrows. Sunny Bank is difficult to investigate as it's under scrub woodland but Halliwell Hill may be investigated in total. Find the northeast corner of it, at 'original' ground level, and identify the forecourt. Once you find and recognise that your scepticism will evaporate. The length, width and height all fit E.H.'s Characterisation Criteria. Yes, it is high, but it's never been ploughed.

If you download my sheet you'll find that I suspect a whole cluster of long barrows around there. Most of them can be argued either way, but not Halliwell Hill - that undamaged forecourt makes it. One of the excavation ditches also arguably shows on aerial images taken during summer droughts. But go and find Thurstones, they're by the side of a public bridleway, just ten minutes from Barrow Bridge, and are easy to find.

And, please, consider what you can give to these monuments - which are truly lost. Will you make a representation to the Museum boss? Or to the County Archaeologist who has never - officially - heard of the barrows at Toothills Playing flds. A round barrow in someone's back garden is pretty scarce. The then Museum boss hopped about with excitement when he saw it - but told nobody about it. Are you just going to leave it? If you've recognised a Round Barrow it's your 'public duty' to notify the statutory body, surely?