tjj wrote:
I'm very glad you said that Dee. I would not want to dismiss 28 years of someone's life as BOLLOCKS. Driven, obsessed he may have been but at least its visionary and, without checking it out (anyone going to Calgary in the near future?) how will we ever know for sure.
It was "MORE THAN LIKELY BOLLOCKS " and was as much a response to the DISCUSS as anything , the probability was also important .But it is also applicable to the site . There are two problems for me wilith this site . Three , of approx 150 ,major medicine wheel sites that have been suggested as having meaningful astro alignments but they are not generally accepted as such by most archaeoastronomers , plus when a new one appears that looks like it's provenance as a monument is dubious ,according to a pro archaeo , I don't feel too confident about this actually being a candidate and think it is more than likely not what the discoverer believes . Mainstream archaeology is wrong a lot of the time and it needs constant reminding of it's failings but when compared with fringe stuff , most of which gets forgotten over the years , it rarely fails . The questions I want to ask in archaeological terms are 1: do we know, for how many thousands of years was North America inhabited by its indigenous people and 2: how did they get there. If links can be traced back to other advanced civilisations then anything is possible.