thanks to you all.

amazing what thoughts a single grain found at stonehenge can generate.
the proof required for my theory is not the presence of grain, but rather the presence of MORE grain inside the monument compared to the outside countryside.......

if you take a look at the video from day 11 of the dig , you will see that the archaeologists intend to examine the soil for microscopic snails to deternine if the area around stonehenge was forest or grassland.....my bet is that they will find that it was grassland.

there was much initial objection to my theory on the grounds that salisbury plains was not grassland at the time of stonehenge. this determination of snails will be one more piece of the puzzle.

here is a mental exercise: suspend your preconceptions of stonehenge and take a moment and ask this question. "what if stonehenge Was a grain mill?" "what if it IS true?" during this moment of open mindedness, you will realize that it is important for this theory to be carried to it's ultimate conclusion... to do less would be to dismiss out-of-hand the possibility. At least this theory can be proved or disproved by scientific soil tests. what do we have to loose in testing the theory?

if there were a simple soil test for the astronomical or religious use theories there would be a rush to do the test.

your humble servant ,
clyde