Rupert Soskin wrote:
I met Robert Schoch last year, the geologist who's been making academic archaeologists spit teeth for ages about Giza. He's finally proved, and I do mean proved, that the sphinx dates back quite a few thousand years earlier than the egyptologists have always said.
He's proved a minimum date of 7-5000bc but off the record he said that if the data currently being analysed pans out, it could push it back to about 15,000bc.
Love it!
Carefull now, it would seem so via errosion patterns and such,but the foundation of the sphinx was there for eon's before any thought of carving it into the supposed likeness of Khafra. Shifting sands, wind erosion and such were all a part of what remains today. And so i believe that yes its been there an awfull long time, but not as the Sphinx. It's important to consider that the sphinx {In particular the face} is a carving and not a construction.
