scubi63 wrote:
'I may be a sceptic, but whether I agree with their conclusions or not, I've seen people write in an eloquent, intelligent and rational fashion about subjects such as ley lines and dowsing. A little respect for those with divergent opinions really wouldn't hurt.'
Personally I think the "ley line " business in relation to energy and all that stuff is bollocks , fact is though Sites of the same period and typology are found on lines that are very accurate and often on the same alignment as major astro events , whether that was intentional (which I doubt) or epiphenomenal or coinicidence , don't really like the term but it'll suffice just now who knows but don't ignore the facts . I think a lot of the antipathy come from knee jerk archaeos being macho with "ley lines don't exist" , usually associated with "and druids have nothing to do with Stonehenge " , easy targets , both unlikely but they later talk of phenomenology and alignments , and a priestly caste who may have oversaw the building of monuments etc ,is that's not what druids were , only earlier ? Couldn't agree more. A little leg pulling is fine and makes for a good and fun discussion, but like religion, we should always respect each others opinions. We don't have to believe or accept what we hear but we may learn something if we bother to listen.
:o)
Chris