close
more_vert

Sanctuary wrote:
Littlestone wrote:
See news - http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/93909/news/stonehenge.html Looks interesting, although it cant be in ‘Old English’ if it’s 17th century.
Very interesting, I wonder who wrote them as it doesn't say does it? I guess the selling price may well indicate how well-known the author was in this field.
C'mon you two, if the date is right it cona only be Mr Jones' posthumous publication.

V VBB

VBB wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
Littlestone wrote:
See news - http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/93909/news/stonehenge.html Looks interesting, although it cant be in ‘Old English’ if it’s 17th century.
Very interesting, I wonder who wrote them as it doesn't say does it? I guess the selling price may well indicate how well-known the author was in this field.
C'mon you two, if the date is right it cona only be Mr Jones' posthumous publication.
Sorry, half asleep, I meant if 1655 is right it's gotta be etc.

It is.

See also - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQy6KU-oa6M&feature=player_detailpage#t=201s
and - http://heritageaction.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/17th-century-stonehenge-book-discovered/#comments

If you’re of a delicate constitution you might want to sit down before you see how he handles it.