bolton wanderers

close
more_vert

TMA Ed wrote:
Another thing is that the editors try hard to keep the website lean and useful to contributors and general visitors alike. It may not be helpful to keep 'empty' sites with no information, particularly sites that are not widely recognised as prehistoric.

TMA Ed.

What's the big idea? Last year in September I added the site of Porth Dafarch hut circles on Anglesey,nearly six months later Stubob makes a visit there and erroneously adds the site again, now youv'e got the site added by him. I try hard to find new places to visit not seen by TMA eyes before ,if you notice the dates on the pics you'll see i'm right so do us a favour and give us it back......please
thanks
postie

Apologies. I was tidying up Anglesey and merged the two, not really looking at which was there first. Stubob's had a more inclusive category, so that's why I kept his, probably.
If it means a lot to you I will ask Holy McGrail to reinstate you (it's beyond my powers).

TMA Ed.